September 2003September 29, 2003Judy Miller WatchThis piece by Douglas Jehl should prompt the Times to publish a Jayson Blair-ish correction/apology/mea culpa for the complete and utter bullshit Judith Miller wrote about Iraq for the past year. Lies, Damn Lies, and Partial Poll DataWalter Pincus takes a closer look at a couple of recent polls cited by pro-war folk and administration officials, and finds that Iraqis' love of occupation isn't what it's cracked up to be. The Unbuilding of IraqNewsweek has an excellent anaylsis of the bungled occupation, with lots of juicy quotes and an inside-the-ropes look at the State vs. Defense Department battle. Highly recommended. Just doing the news roundup here ... Time also has a story about "what went wrong." And a much better cover: Tricky Dick Trickier than the Original?One last thing ... the Post has a must-read article about Cheney repeatedly telling the Mohamed Atta-Prague tale and trying to get it into Powell's Feb 2003 UN presentation after it had been debunked. A couple of telling paragraphs:But behind the scenes, the Atta meeting remained tantalizing to Cheney and his staff. Libby -- along with deputy national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, a longtime Cheney associate -- began pushing to include the Atta claim in Powell's appearance before the U.N. Security Council a week after the State of the Union speech. Powell's presentation was aimed at convincing the world of Iraq's ties to terrorists and its pursuit of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.posted by dack | link | Comments (2) September 24, 2003The Week of Living DangerouslyPoor Karim Kadim. Last Thursday the AP photographer's car was shot up and he dodged three 50-caliber machine gun rounds. Yesterday he and his equally unlucky driver were detained and made to stand for three hours in 110 degree heat. What's the over-under before the US finally takes this guy out? The book says 14 days. posted by dack | link | Comments (1)September 17, 2003WTF?We have seen that when we have an incident in the conduct of our operations, when we killed an innocent civilian, based on their ethic, their values, their culture, they would seek revenge. Of course, revenge is never part of white, Christian cultures. posted by dack | link | Comments (2)September 15, 2003Delayed RetractionYesterday on Meet the Press Dick Cheney said he "misspoke" in his March 16, 2003 MTP appearance when he claimed Saddam Hussein had "reconstituted nuclear weapons." Better late than never, I suppose, but why did it take him 6 months? posted by dack | link | Comments (1)September 12, 2003That's Our Report For TonightIf anyone caught Nightline last night, about 1/2 of the show was about the ongoing guerrilla war and pre-Taliban vibe going on in Afghanistan ... something written about here a couple of days ago. Anyhow, Koppel closed the show with a bit I found especially true and poignant: It's a tough call. When roughly 3,000 people -- most of them Americans, but people from all over the world -- are killed in four synchronized acts of terrorism on one bloody day, attention must be paid. The survivors, the mourners, deserve to know that millions of us grieve with them. We Have A WinnerThe winner of last week's caption contest is Steve. Steve, if you're out there, drop me a line and I'll arrange for some RE or dack.com swag to be sent your way.
"George, we're going to make your Yale hazing look like your National Guard Duty." posted by dack | link | Comments (1)September 10, 2003Operation Enduring Guerrilla WarCompletely lost in the hubub over W's $87b request is the proposed expenditure for Operation Enduring Freedom. As you may recall, this was the war in Afghanistan the US won almost two years ago. Yesterday the Financial Times reported an $11b chunk of the $87b is slated for continuing operations in Afghanistan. (A much smaller amount -- $800m -- is for reconstruction.) Given that there are only about 11,000 US troops in Afghanistan, simple math says it costs $1m per soldier for a year's worth of deployment, which seems godawfully expensive. It's not like we're launching $2m missiles at mud huts anymore ... at least not yet. All I can figure is the warlords are price gouging. Bastards. posted by dack | link | Comments (2)September 08, 2003Abandon All HopeIn case you missed it over the weekend: Hussein Link to 9/11 Lingers in Many MindsNearing the second anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, seven in 10 Americans continue to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a role in the attacks, even though the Bush administration and congressional investigators say they have no evidence of this. Part of the 70% is 32-year-old teacher (a teacher for chrissakes!) Kim Morrison: From what we've heard from the media, it seems like what they feel is that Saddam and the whole al Qaeda thing are connected. Juan Cole sums things up nicely today: Although eccentric billionnaire reactionaries like Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon Scaife have managed to bamboozle 69% of Americans into believing that Saddam had something to do with September 11, he did not. And any informed person knows he did not.posted by dack | link | Comments (8) September 05, 2003What Is He Saying?
Best entry receives a RE t-shirt (when they go into production). posted by dack | link | Comments (19)September 04, 2003End Run 'Round RummyWhile Dexter Filkins is writing about jogging in Baghdad, the Washington Post continues to kick the Times' ass with yet another great scoop. In what was billed as a routine session, Powell told Bush that they had to go to the United Nations with a resolution seeking a U.N.-sanctioned military force in Iraq -- something the administration had resisted for nearly five months. Powell, whose department had long favored such an action, informed the commander in chief that the military brass supported the State Department's position despite resistance by the Pentagon's civilian leadership. Bush and his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, whose office had been slow to embrace the U.N. resolution, quickly agreed, according to administration officials who described the episode. Perhaps the beginning of the end for Rumsfeld? UPDATE: Powell calls WaPo article "total fiction". posted by dack | link | Comments (1)September 03, 2003Down-Home Comix Presents...The Merry Antics Of Cowboy George & Uncle Osama! Once... Then... And... But... So...
September 02, 2003Non-Walking WoundedYet another scoop by the Post. Although Central Command keeps a running total of the wounded, it releases the number only when asked -- making the combat injuries of U.S. troops in Iraq one of the untold stories of the war.posted by dack | link | Comments (3) |